<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" ID="56118">
<titleInfo>
<title>The Oral and the Written Gospel</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="Personal Name" authority="">
<namePart>Werner H. Kelber</namePart>
<role><roleTerm type="text">Additional Author</roleTerm></role>
</name>
<typeOfResource manuscript="yes" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
<originInfo>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Philadelphia</placeTerm></place>
<publisher>Fortress Press</publisher>
<dateIssued>1983</dateIssued>
<issuance>monographic</issuance>
<edition></edition>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="gmd">Print</form>
<extent></extent>
</physicalDescription>
<note>[From the Author's Preface] I have written this book out of a concern for what seemed to me a disproportionately print-oriented hermeneutic in our study of the Bible. Walter J. Ong, who has amply documented the problem outside the field of biblical studies, has termed it the &#34;chirographic bias&#34; of Western intellectuals, and Lou H. Silberman has, in the words of Marshall McLuhan, drawn critical attention to the &#34;Gutenberg galaxy&#34; in which much of biblical scholarship is conducted. In New Testament studies the problem manifests itself in the inability of form criticism to produce an oral hermeneutic, our misconceived search for &#34;the original&#34; form of oral materials, the collaboration of form with redaction criticism in reconstructing tradition according to the paradigm of linearity, and a prevalent tendency to perceive the written gospel in continuity with oral tradition. The current revival of the Griesbach hypothesis, which seeks to explain the Markan text as a conflation of Matthean and Lukan texts, is further testimony to the triumph of visualism and our growing inability to come to terms with spoken words in the synoptic tradition.</note>
<classification>225.663</classification><identifier type="isbn">0800606892</identifier><location>
<physicalLocation>Perpustakaan STTB Bandung Theological Seminary</physicalLocation>
<shelfLocator>225.663 Kel o</shelfLocator>
<holdingSimple>
<copyInformation>
<numerationAndChronology type="1">E91000304</numerationAndChronology>
<sublocation>Non Fiction</sublocation>
<shelfLocator>225.663 Kel o</shelfLocator>
</copyInformation>
</holdingSimple>
</location>
<slims:image>The_Oral_and_the_Written_Gospel.jpg</slims:image>
<recordInfo>
<recordIdentifier>56118</recordIdentifier>
<recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-12-15 09:59:10</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2025-03-17 17:39:50</recordChangeDate>
<recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo></mods></modsCollection>