<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" ID="48832">
<titleInfo>
<title>The Inexhaustible God:</title>
<subTitle>Biblical Faith and The Challenge of Process Theism</subTitle>
</titleInfo>
<name type="Personal Name" authority="">
<namePart>Gruenler, Royce Gordon.</namePart>
<role><roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm></role>
</name>
<typeOfResource manuscript="yes" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
<originInfo>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Grand Rapids</placeTerm></place>
<publisher>Baker Books</publisher>
<dateIssued>1983</dateIssued>
<issuance>monographic</issuance>
<edition></edition>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="gmd">Print</form>
<extent></extent>
</physicalDescription>
<note>A solid critique of process theology from the evangelical side is overdue,&#34; asserts Clark H. Pinnock, professor of theology at McMaster Divinity College. &#34;Royce Gruenler, because of personal involvement with process theology, having had to extricate himself from it, is in the proper position to put his finger on its weaknesses and unbib- lical character, which he has ably done.&#34;

The author confesses that &#34;much of my own life and strug- gles with God's sovereignty and human freedom, with biblical revelation and philosophical thought, appear on every page.&#34; He concludes &#34;that biblical faith is superior in every way to the suggested improvements offered by process theism.&#34; &#34;Problems of power, persons, and time in process theism&#34; is the subject of part 1, a critique of Whitehead, Hartshorne, and Cobb. Part 2 explicates &#34;twenty false propositions in process metaphysics&#34; and constitutes a summary critique of Hartshorne's theory of divine relativity. The final part concerns biblical revela- tion and human speculation, criticizing Neville, Ogden, Cobb, and Ford.</note>
<classification>211.3</classification><identifier type="isbn">0801037948</identifier><location>
<physicalLocation>Transformatio Library Bandung Theological Seminary</physicalLocation>
<shelfLocator>211.3 Gru i</shelfLocator>
<holdingSimple>
<copyInformation>
<numerationAndChronology type="1">E94018262</numerationAndChronology>
<sublocation>Non Fiction</sublocation>
<shelfLocator>211.3 Gru i</shelfLocator>
</copyInformation>
</holdingSimple>
</location>
<slims:image>3.jpg</slims:image>
<recordInfo>
<recordIdentifier>48832</recordIdentifier>
<recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-12-11 08:36:43</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2024-11-26 17:47:44</recordChangeDate>
<recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo></mods></modsCollection>