<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" ID="42222">
<titleInfo>
<title>Choice, Contract, Consent</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="Personal Name" authority="">
<namePart>Anthony de Jasay</namePart>
<role><roleTerm type="text">Additional Author</roleTerm></role>
</name>
<typeOfResource manuscript="yes" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
<originInfo>
<place><placeTerm type="text"></placeTerm></place>
<publisher>Institute of Economic Affairs</publisher>
<dateIssued>1991</dateIssued>
<issuance>monographic</issuance>
<edition></edition>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code">id</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="text">Indonesia</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="gmd">Text</form>
<extent></extent>
</physicalDescription>
<note>Choice, Contract, Consent, in restating liberalism, finds its rock-bottom foundations in six first principles that are either self-evident, or readily acceptable to bona fide reason. These simple, relatively undemanding principles dictate the outline of a stable political doctrine. The doctrine is strict, in that it confines the state to mandatory tasks, instead of allowing it discretionary latitude within rules. This is a loose constraint because collective choice can choose its own rules. Political doctrine informs practical politics. In politics, collective choice replace and often overrides individual choice. For this to be legitimate, it does not suffice to respect procedures, such as those demanded by democracy. Collective choice to be morally justified, needs substantive legitimacy too. Choice, Contract, Consent develops the conditions that substantive legitimacy must meet and delineates the restricted class of cases where a liberal government may pre empt the voluntary choices of its citizens.</note>
<classification>148 Jas c</classification><identifier type="isbn">0255362463</identifier><location>
<physicalLocation>Perpustakaan STTB Bandung Theological Seminary</physicalLocation>
<shelfLocator>148 Jas c-1</shelfLocator>
<holdingSimple>
<copyInformation>
<numerationAndChronology type="1">E06001360</numerationAndChronology>
<sublocation>Non Fiction</sublocation>
<shelfLocator>148 Jas c</shelfLocator>
</copyInformation>
</holdingSimple>
</location>
<slims:image>819lPbP6RgL._SY466_.jpg</slims:image>
<recordInfo>
<recordIdentifier>42222</recordIdentifier>
<recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-12-04 09:53:37</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2024-09-03 17:19:43</recordChangeDate>
<recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo></mods></modsCollection>