<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" ID="30606">
<titleInfo>
<title>In defense of theology</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="Personal Name" authority="">
<namePart>Clark, Gordon  H</namePart>
<role><roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm></role>
</name>
<typeOfResource manuscript="yes" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
<originInfo>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Michigan</placeTerm></place>
<publisher>Mott Media</publisher>
<dateIssued>1984</dateIssued>
<issuance>monographic</issuance>
<edition></edition>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="gmd">Print</form>
<extent></extent>
</physicalDescription>
<note>In Defense of Theology is a well reasoned, thoroughly balanced evaluation of biblical theclogy by one of the major Christian thinkers of our century. Says Ronald H. Nash, &#34;In the minds of many. Gordon Haddon Clark is perhaps the dean of those twentieth-century American philosophers who have sought to develop a Christian Weltanschauung consistent with the Christian Scriptures.&#34;

&#34;Theology,&#34; notes Dr. Clark, &#34;once acclaimed 'the Queen of the Sciences, today hardly rises to the rank of scullery maid.&#34; The devout ignore it. Unbelievers hold it in contempt. And so, with less excuse, do the neo-orthodox.

The devout often set up a false opposition between theology and the Bible. &#34;Sola Scriptura,&#34; they remind us and Gordon Clark agrees. But then he goes on to show...
- Why preaching itself is impossible without theology
- Our duty to understand Scripture requires theology
- So does our duty to explain Scripture

The unbelievers present a thornier problem, but Dr. Clark grasps the nettle: &#34;The methodology of the present essay is biblical. Neither natural theology derived from science, nor mystical theology derived from so-called religious experience, plays any part. The content of this theology comes entirely from the Bible alone.&#34;

And from the Bible Dr. Clark approaches the problem of atheism-a problem, he reminds us, that we are duty-bound to face. And here too, theology is necessary.

Dr. Clark's weightiest adversary is neo-orthodoxy. It dominates the mainline churches-even though, he avers, it is &#34;fundamentally (i.e. religiously) irrational. Taking on heavyweights like Barth and Brunner, he does not hesitate to challenge their claim to be counted among the evangelicals.</note>
<subject authority=""><topic>Apologetics</topic></subject>
<classification>239 Cla d</classification><identifier type="isbn"></identifier><location>
<physicalLocation>Transformatio Library Bandung Theological Seminary</physicalLocation>
<shelfLocator>239 Cla d</shelfLocator>
<holdingSimple>
<copyInformation>
<numerationAndChronology type="1">E94018527</numerationAndChronology>
<sublocation>Non Fiction</sublocation>
<shelfLocator>239 Cla d</shelfLocator>
</copyInformation>
</holdingSimple>
</location>
<slims:image>s-l1200_%281%29.jpg</slims:image>
<recordInfo>
<recordIdentifier>30606</recordIdentifier>
<recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-11-13 16:17:23</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2024-11-08 15:51:43</recordChangeDate>
<recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo></mods></modsCollection>